Creeping Sharia is real and growing….and we need to wake up
Via: http://redstate.com
Arrested for disorderly conduct -outside- an Arab Cultural Festival - for simply offering a pamphlet (Gospel in English and Arabic ) to people walking by - with no verbal harranguing or harassment evident in the video. Police restricting exercise of free speech for a 5 block area around the festival, according to four detained Christian Missionaries.
Read the full post at redstate.com
The media smears Rand Paul
Now that Rand Paul has the Republican nomination for a Kentucky Senate seat, the media mavens who see all opposing views as motivated by racism, homephobia or religious beliefs, have started up their engines of hate.
I listened as host Robert Siegel baited Rand Paul, asking whether the Civil Rights Act went too far since Paul has said that the Americans with Disabilities Act was an overreach of the federal government.
Paul’s response was,
“What I’ve always said is that I’m opposed to institutional racism, and I would’ve, had I’ve been alive at the time, I think, had the courage to march with Martin Luther King to overturn institutional racism, and I see no place in our society for institutional racism.”
“I think a lot of things could be handled locally. For example, I think that we should try to do everything we can to allow for people with disabilities and handicaps. You know, we do it in our office with wheelchair ramps and things like that. I think if you have a two-story office and you hire someone who’s handicapped, it might be reasonable to let him have an office on the first floor rather than the government saying you have to have a $100,000 elevator. And I think when you get to the solutions like that, the more local the better, and the more common sense the decisions are, rather than having a federal government make those decisions.”
That was followed by an appearance on MSNBC (Rachel Maddow) where the smear machine moved into top gear.
I’m not a libertarian, nor do I live or vote in Kentucky, but I’m amenable to reasonable common sense views that would keep the Federal Government doing what it should be be doing, protecting our security, representing our interests with foreign nations, promoting our economic well being through international trade but otherwise staying out of our back pockets, our homes, our beliefs and our personal and cultural lives.
Obama chooses Mexico and Illegals over Arizona and the majority of it’s Citizens

The President of Mexico, in the United States, on the lawn of the White House rails against a law passed by the Arizona legislature and signed by the Governor of Arizona and supported by 70% of the citizens of the State of Arizona, in an attempt to aid in curtailing a lawless flood of illegal aliens and drugs, and our President sides with Mexico and the illegals against the citizens of Arizona.
Obama demonstrated with the full pomp and ceremony of his office that he has greater affinity for those who break our laws, despoil our borderlands and by their actions and words laugh at our sovereignty, than he does for the majority of the citizens of Arizona. Come to that, I’m not at all sure that lack of concern doesn’t extend to rest of us.
New Jersey Governor Christie responds…
| Gov Christie calls S-L columnist thin-skinned for inquiring about his ‘confrontational tone’ |
Free Speech Amendment (1a) — from the The Right Coast
This amendment shall be known as the “Power to the People, Power to the People Right On!” Amendment. Nothing in the amendment right before this one shall be construed as allowing persons to say Bad Things. Bad Things shall be defined by Congress anytime before November, 2010. Congress shall have the authority to establish a Special Administration for the Liberation of Speech for the People, Right On, and may promulgate regulations regarding speech by Big Corporations or anything that reminds them of such speech. Bad Things shall include any disrespectful nodding or word mouthing by Justices of the Supreme Court during Presidential addresses, especially if they touch upon freedom of speech, such as it may be. Nothing in this amendment shall be construed as giving anybody the authority to restrict the speech of law professors about any topic whatsoever at any time whatsoever. A law professor is anyone who has ever taught at a law school, whether or not on a tenure track.
A “Right On” response to President Obama’s SOTU admonitions to Congress to act on Supreme Courts’ free speech protection for corporations.
Red China - 60th Anniversary today. Huge Celebration - Parades - Food -Dances…etc…
This is an excerpt from the Canadian National Post Newspaper
When asked if ordinary citizens could come and join in the celebration of the founding of the People’s Republic of China in 1949, watch as the parade makes its way along Chang’an Ave. to Tiananmen Square, a spokesperson at the 60th anniversary press office said: “No.”
Invitations, accreditation or special passes are de rigueur for anyone who wants to get near the parade route or the gala show and fireworks later in the evening. Even people who live along the route have been warned not to come out on their balconies to watch the festivities. They are allowed to look out of their “closed” windows, but have been advised they will get a better view on the television.
Read more:http://www.nationalpost.com/news/story.html?id=2023991#ixzz0SgcyIuSl
Funny, in a way, but only if you’re not behind the “closed” windows.
Sarkozy comments at the United Nations Security Council Summit on Nuclear Non-Proliferation, on Sept 24th.
Comments ignored by the majority of U.S. Media
We say: reductions must be made. And President Obama has even said, ?I dream of a world without [nuclear weapons].? Yet before our very eyes, two countries are currently doing the exact opposite. Since 2005, Iran has violated five Security Council resolutions. Since 2005, Secretary-General, the international community has called on Iran to engage in dialogue. An offer of dialogue was made in 2005, an offer of dialogue was made in 2006, an offer of dialogue was made in 2007, an offer of dialogue was made in 2008, and another one was made in 2009. President Obama, I support the Americans? outstretched hand. But what did the international community gain from these offers of dialogue? Nothing. More enriched uranium, more centrifuges, and on top of that, a statement by Iranian leaders proposing to wipe a UN member State off the map.
Netanyahu’s UN General Assembly Speech
A full transcript of the speech is here.
A dose of historical and current truths, delivered to an agency little interested or willing to credit either.
Sotomayor’s racist remark
“I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion [as a judge] than a white male who hasn?t lived that life.” -Judge Sonia Sotomayor, in her Judge Mario G. Olmos Law and Cultural Diversity Lecture at the University of California (Berkeley) School of Law in 2001
The Replublican’s in Washington seem to be agonizing over calling Judge Sotomayor to task for this remark.
Why?
The remark is racist. She may not be, but the remark absolutely is and she should answer for that.
We do not condone such remarks against blacks, hispanics, native americans, homosexuals or any other group labeled as minority.
Why do liberals insist that it’s just fine to condone and accept such remarks against white males.
Is racism only racism if aimed at groups with members below a certain numeric quantity.
Is there some magic number threshhold that once crossed opens you to contemptible treatment that would not be tolerated
if you were below that magic number.
No. It isn’t numbers that matter here, it’s membership in the selected groups with tickets to ride the victim train and white males have no ticket.
If the GOP accepts and doesn’t challenge such blatant and discriminatory views they’d best close up shop. The country has no need of a Democratic Lite party and conservatives who accept selective discrimination don’t deserve the name.
A preview of Supreme Court things to come?
Obama’s pick thinks that courts make policy…( with perhaps only a wink at the constitution).
and certainly isn’t shy about the value of one ethnicty vs another when it comes to doing the job…
“I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion [as a judge] than a white male who hasn?t lived that life.” -Judge Sonia Sotomayor, in her Judge Mario G. Olmos Law and Cultural Diversity Lecture at the University of California (Berkeley) School of Law in 2001
U.S. Will Pay $2.6 Million to Train Chinese Prostitutes to Drink Responsibly on the Job
NIH (National Institute of Health) grant for $2.6 Million to teach Prostitutes in Guangx, China, proper alcohol use, while they’re on the job.
To keep you up to speed on the latest doublespeak, prostitutes are referred to as “female sex workers” or FSW and their handlers are “gatekeepers”. (read here)
Makes sending your money to the U.S. Treasury Dept, seem like a great idea, doesn’t it?
A freefall dive into generational bankruptcy
Thanks to StopSpendingourFuture.org
Worth a few minutes of your time — to perhaps put these insane $’s into perspective!
Worst idea of the day -Mass. to stop fee-for-services and pay doctors yearly lump sum per patient.
Massachusetts proposes to stop fee-for-service payments to doctors (and others) and instead pay each doctor a single annual lump sum for each patients yearly care. This they claim would maybe save the state a munificent 5% of health costs.
What it will cost us -the patients, is that individually tailored medical care would be destroyed. Patients will become an endless stream of quantified sameness. .
All patients are individual and unique and their medical care requires the application of individual and unique medical services. This idea would replace individual care with prepaid assembly-line care.
It would serve to erode the time-tested doctor patient relationship and incentivize doctors to provide the minimum care necessary to stay ok within the bureaucratic dictates.
The commission claims that the state would carefully monitor the quality of care to insure patient health.
Yup! Think elevators. Think bridges. Think tunnels.
It is the worst idea I’ve heard so far today. Trading individual medical care for a supposed 5% cost savings, should tell everyone exactly what value our state government places on the well being of each of us.
What’s the governor’s email address. Can’t find it?
Try this:
Phone: 617.725.4005
888.870.7770 (in state)
Peres declares: US and Israel 100% on same page when it comes to Iran
So the Jerusalem Post reports
Both Peres and Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman have indicated Israeli support for the Road Map
President Obama and his chief of staff, Rahm Emmanuel are reportedly pressing Israel for a two-state agreement with linkage to aid in deterring Iran’s bid for a nuclear bomb.
Foreign Minister Lieberman declared that action would need to be taken if three months of diplomacy elapsed with no results.
Meanwhile, Iran continues to stir it’s bubbling nuclear cauldron and the brew gets closer to usable strength
Whether it’s three months or 6 months or a year, it’s a reasonable assumption that Iran’s attempt to become a nuclear power in the region, is a deadly serious issue that needs resolution in the very short term.
Such a term cannot include the Palestinian question, which has been in contention for 61 years and is no closer to resolution now then it was when it began.
Hamas controls Gaza, Fatah is in the West Bank, neither is willing to recognize Israel’s right to exist.
Peace between any two entities requires both sides to desire peace and both sides to willingly accede the others right to exist. The crux here is that the Israeli side will accept a peaceful Palestinian neighbor while the Palestinian side will only accept peace without an Israeli neighbor
Such a situation can only resolve to a continuation of the status quo, a one state solution by force or a two state solution through a coercive negotiation or an Israel that unilaterally decides to accept it’s own demise.
I fear that Obama and his advisors are not adverse to either of the latter, so long as a Palestinian state comes into being.
Have to wonder if anyone trapped in the paradigm - ’satisfy Palestinian’s now and at any cost and the h*ll with Israel’ - has ever read this excerpt from Article Thirteen of the Hamas Covenant of 1988
“Initiatives, and so-called peaceful solutions and international conferences, are in contradiction to the principles of the Islamic Resistance Movement.”
..”There is no solution for the Palestinian question except through Jihad. Initiatives, proposals and international conferences are all a waste of time and vain endeavors.”
The U.S. and the rest of the involved world should require that the Palestinian representatives publicly repudiate that position and accept and recognize Israel’s right to exist or the only discussions that can take place must be viewed as deliberately weighted against Israel, the only true U.S. ally and democratic state in the region.





